🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about the comments delivered by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown was understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Even if the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive power on each forehand and backhand are more than enough to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has seen the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of much shorter men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a several significant, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of American men winning grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the All England Club last four in July.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was fairly ironclad evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never particularly seem like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just say his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually highly improbable for all other players. {